Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:45

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
FDA rolls out AI tool agency-wide, weeks ahead of schedule - statnews.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What it is like to have sex with a relative woman?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Natural Tick Repellent Found—on Donkey Skin - Newser
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.